RehabMeasures Instrument
  1. Rehabilitation Measures Database
  2. General Health Questionnaire-28

General Health Questionnaire-28

Purpose

The GHQ-28 is used to indicate psychological well-being and detect possible cases of psychiatric disorders (psychiatric morbidity).

Link to Instrument

instrument details

Acronym GHQ-28

Area of Assessment

Depression
General Health

Assessment Type

Patient Reported Outcomes

Administration Mode

Paper & Pencil

Cost

Not Free

Cost Description

For contact information and permission to, see Description.

Diagnosis/Conditions

  • Brain Injury Recovery
  • Cardiac Dysfunction
  • Stroke Recovery

Populations

Stroke
Older Adults and Geriatric Care
Non-Specific Patient Population

Key Descriptions

  • A 28-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess four aspects of distress (McDowell and Newell, 1996):
    1) Depression
    2) Anxiety
    3) Social impairment
    4) Hypochondriasis
  • Respondents rate each question using options provided
    1) "Better than usual”
    2) "Same as usual”
    3) “Worse than usual”
    4) “Much worse than usual”
  • Choice of scoring method may impact diagnosis (Richard et al, 2004, n = 1145, general medicine patients).
  • GHQ (Acute) scoring methods (traditional method); scores of:
    1) 0 for choices 1 and 2
    2) 1 for choices 3 and 4
  • cGHQ (Chronic) scoring has been suggested for patients with persistent complaints:
    1) For the 18 negatively valanced items: 0 for choice 1 and score of 1 for choices 2, 3, and 4
    2) 7 positively valanced items: 0 for choices 1 and 2 and 1 for choices 3 and 4
  • Interpreting Results:
    1) GHQ method; average score = 6.28 (Median = 4; SD = 6.38)
    2) cGHQ method; average score = 11.45 (Median = 11; SD = 6.73)
  • Prior research has not found a significant difference between gender, age, language or educational level (Goldberg et al, 1997).
  • Provides an indication of ‘psychological distress’ rather than depression, it may be more sensitive to the issues faced by stroke survivors.
  • Contact information and permission to use:
    MAPI Research Trust, Lyon, France:
    Email: PROinformation@mapi-trust.org
    Internet: www.mapi-trust.org

Number of Items

28

Time to Administer

3-4 minutes

Required Training

Reading an Article/Manual

Age Ranges

Adult

18 - 64

years

Elderly Adult

65 +

years

ICF Domain

Body Function

Measurement Domain

Emotion
General Health

Considerations

  • The GHQ-28 is designed to screen not diagnose
  • Total scores can be used an index of severity
  • Scoring method may impact interpretation: There are currently three different scoring methods:
    • Conventional scoring; the first 2 response options are scored as 0; the last 2 as 1
    • Likert scoring: uses weights based on
      the frequency of the symptom. 
    • Corrected GHQ; similar to the conventional methods. For items that indicate an illness or health problem, responses of “same as usual” are scored as 1 rather than 0. Scoring is unchanged for other items.

Do you see an error or have a suggestion for this instrument summary? Please e-mail us!

Stroke

back to Populations

Cut-Off Scores

Chronic and Acute stroke patients: (Lincoln et al, 2003; n = 143; mean age = 66 (13.5) years; time since onset not specified)

  • The optimum cut-score for the GHQ-28 in relation to DSM-III-R criteria was 11/12 (sensitivity 81%, specificity 68%).
  • However, no cut scores on the GHQ-28 demonstrated satisfactory sensitivity (for details see responsiveness section)
  • Patients diagnosed as depressed based on ICD-10 or DSM-III-R scores also had significantly higher scores on the GHQ-28. 
  • Goldberg (1978) suggests that participants with total scores of 23 or below should classified as
    non-psychiatric, while participants with scores > 24 may be classified as psychiatric

Normative Data

Chronic Stroke: (Robinson & Price, 1982; n = 103; mean age = 60 (11) years)

  • GHQ Score = 5
    • Initially depressed = 29%
    • Depressed at 6 months = 68%
  • GHQ Score = 6
    • Initially depressed = 23%
    • Depressed at 6 months = 60% 
  • GHQ Score = 8
    • Initially depressed = 17%
    • Depressed at 6 months = 46%

Test/Retest Reliability

Chronic Stroke: (Robinson & Price, 1982)

  • Excellent test re-test reliability (r = 0.90, within two months)

Criterion Validity (Predictive/Concurrent)

Chronic and Acute stroke patients: (Lincoln et al, 2003)

 

 

 

 

ICD-10

 

 

 

 

DSM-III-R

 

 

 

 

 

 

Not Depressed

Depressed

 

Not Depressed

Depressed

 

 

 

74 (52%)

(42%)

Kappa

112 (77%)

21 (15%)

Kappa

GHQ-28

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Not depressed

31

1

0.40

32

0

0.12

 

Depressed

40

59

 

77

21

 

BDI

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Not depressed

17

4

0.16

20

1

0.05

 

Depressed

54

56

 

89

20

 

WDI

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Not depressed

32

5

0.36

36

1

0.12

 

Depressed

38

55

 

72

20

 

DSM-III-R = Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-III-R
ICD-10 = International Classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders 10
BDI = Beck Depression Inventory
WDI = Wakefeld Depression Inventory
 

Chronic Stroke: (O'Rourke, 1998; n = 105; median age = 68; assessed > 6 months post stroke)

  • No difference between the GHQ-30 and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Scale was found for:
    • Any DSM-IV diagnosis (p = 0.95) 
    • Grouped depression (p = 0.56)
    • Anxiety (p = 0.25)

 

Chronic Stroke: (Robinson & Price, 1982)

  • Excellent correlations with other measures of depression 
    • PSE (r = 0.88)
    • Hamilton (r = .88)
    • Zung (r = .86)

Construct Validity

Acute Stroke: (Thomas & Lincoln, 2006; n = 123 stroke patients; assessed at 1 and 6 months post-stroke)

 

BDI scores at Recruitment:

  • Mildly Depressed (BDI 11–18)
    • GHQ-28: Median Score = 27.0 (IQR = 21.5 to 36.0)
  • Severely Depressed (BDI > 19)
    • GHQ-28: Median Score = 44.0 (IQR = 32.0 to 54.5)

 

BDI scores 6 Months Post Stroke:

  • Mildly Depressed (BDI 11–18)
    • GHQ-28: Median Score = 28.0 (IQR = 22.0 to 37.0)
  • Severely Depressed (BDI > 19)
    • GHQ-28: Median Score = 48.0 (IQR = 35.0 to 55.0)

IQR = Inter Quartile Range; e.g. the distance between the 75th percentile and the 25th percentile, also called the "mid-spread" or "middle fifty".

Content Validity

The GHQ-28 is a scaled version of the original 60-item measure.  523 completed CHQ-60's were factor analyzed to produce the four 7 items subscales found in the current GHQ-28

Responsiveness

Chronic and Acute stroke patients: (Lincoln et al, 2003)
 

GHQ Sensitivity and specificity of cut-off scores:

 

 

 

 

 

ICD-10 diagnosis

 

DSM-III-R diagnosis

 

GHQ cut-off

Sensitivity

Specificity

Sensitivity

Specificity

5

0.98

0.35

1.00

0.24

6

0.98

0.44

1.00

0.29

7

0.88

0.55

0.95

0.41

8

0.85

0.61

0.95

0.47

9

0.78

0.63

0.95

0.52

10

0.72

0.68

0.86

0.57

11

0.63

0.72

0.81

0.63

12

0.57

0.73

0.81

0.68

13

0.48

0.76

0.76

0.73

14

0.47

0.80

0.71

0.76

15

0.43

0.84

0.67

0.80

Older Adults and Geriatric Care

back to Populations

Interrater/Intrarater Reliability

Elderly population: (Malakouti et al, 2007; n = 204; mean age >59 years; Iranian (Farsi) sample) 

  • Excellent, Cronbach's alpha = .90

Non-Specific Patient Population

back to Populations

Interrater/Intrarater Reliability

Ischaemic Heart Disease: (Failde et al, 2000; n = 185; mean age = 60.2 (10.4); Spanish sample)

  • Excellent, Cronbach's alpha = .95

Internal Consistency

Ischaemic heart disease: (Failde et al, 2000)

  • Excellent Internal Consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95)

Bibliography

Failde, I., I. Ramos, et al. (2000). "Comparison between the GHQ-28 and SF-36 (MH 1-5) for the assessment of the mental health in patients with ischaemic heart disease." Eur J Epidemiol 16(4): 311-316. Find it on PubMed

Li, G. Y., H. Ueki, et al. (2006). "Association between the scores on the general health questionnaire-28 and the saliva levels of 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol in normal volunteers." Biol Psychol 73(2): 209-211. Find it on PubMed

Lincoln, N. B., C. R. Nicholl, et al. (2003). "The validity of questionnaire measures for assessing depression after stroke." Clin Rehabil 17(8): 840-846. Find it on PubMed

McDowell, I. and C. Newell (2006). "The general health questionnaire." Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires: 225–237.

O'Rourke, S., S. MacHale, et al. (1998). "Detecting psychiatric morbidity after stroke: comparison of the GHQ and the HAD Scale." Stroke 29(5): 980-985. Find it on PubMed

Richard, C., M. T. Lussier, et al. (2004). "GHQ-28 and cGHQ-28: implications of two scoring methods for the GHQ in a primary care setting." Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 39(3): 235-243. Find it on PubMed

Robinson, R. G. and T. R. Price (1982). "Post-stroke depressive disorders: a follow-up study of 103 patients." Stroke 13(5): 635-641. Find it on PubMed

Thomas, S. A. and N. B. Lincoln (2006). "Factors relating to depression after stroke." Br J Clin Psychol 45(Pt 1): 49-61. Find it on PubMed

rehabilitation measures

More Instruments Like This

We have reviewed more than 500 instruments for use with a number of diagnoses including stroke, spinal cord injury and traumatic brain injury among several others.

updated Apr 1, 2024

Iowa Scales of Personality...

read more

updated Feb 12, 2024

Millon Behavioral Medicine...

read more

updated Jan 14, 2024

Dynamic Lowenstein Occupat...

read more