Purpose
The FAMS is utilized in persons with MS to capture information regarding quality of life.
Acronym
FAMS
Area of Assessment
Cognition
Sensation & Pain
Activities & Participation
Assessment Type
Patient Reported Outcomes
Administration Mode
Paper & Pencil
Cost
Free
- Instrument consists of 59 items (44 of which are scored) in six quality of life domains:
1) Mobility
2) Symptoms
3) Emotional well-being
4) General contentment (7 items)
5) Thinking/Fatigue (9 items)
6) Family/Social well-being (7 items)
- Additional Concerns subscale of 15 items consists of items that fall outside the six domains but may provide further clinical value.
- Persons completing the tool answer items on a 5-point Likert scale with “0” meaning “not at all” to “4” meaning “very much”.
- Embedded within the FAMS is a 28-item cancer quality of life questionnaire.
- FAMS Total score (range = 0 – 176) is derived by adding:
1) Mobility (r = 0 – 28)
2) Symptoms (r = 0 – 28)
3) Emotional well-being (r = 0 – 28)
4) General contentment (r = 0 – 28)
5) Thinking and fatigue (r = 0 – 36)
6) Family/social wellbeing (r = 0 – 28)
Additional Concerns (r = 0 – 56) are not included in the total FAMS score.
Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
- For guidelines on handling missing data and scoring option, refer to the FAMS Administration and Scoring Guidelines found online at ww.facit.org.
- Instructions and score sheets found at: http:www.facit.org/FACITOrg/Questionnaires
Required Training
Reading an Article/Manual
Instrument Reviewers
Initially reviewed by Amy M. Yorke, PT, NCS and the Rehabilitation Measures Team in 2011.
ICF Domain
Body Structure
Body Function
Activity
Measurement Domain
Emotion
General Health
Motor
Professional Association Recommendation
Recommendations for use of the instrument from the Neurology Section of the American Physical Therapy Association’s Multiple Sclerosis Taskforce (MSEDGE), Parkinson’s Taskforce (PD EDGE), Spinal Cord Injury Taskforce (PD EDGE), Stroke Taskforce (StrokEDGE), Traumatic Brain Injury Taskforce (TBI EDGE), and Vestibular Taskforce (Vestibular EDGE) are listed below. These recommendations were developed by a panel of research and clinical experts using a modified Delphi process.
For detailed information about how recommendations were made, please visit: ANPT Outcome Measures Recommendations (EDGE)
Abbreviations:
HR
Highly Recommend
R
Recommend
LS / UR
Reasonable to use, but limited study in target group / Unable to Recommend
NR
Not Recommended
Recommendations based on level of care in which the assessment is taken:
Acute Care
Inpatient Rehabilitation
Skilled Nursing Facility
Outpatient
Rehabilitation
Home Health
MS EDGE
NR
R
R
R
R
Recommendations based on EDSS Classification:
EDSS 0.0 – 3.5
EDSS 4.0 – 5.5
EDSS 6.0 – 7.5
EDSS 8.0 – 9.5
MS EDGE
R
R
R
R
Recommendations for entry-level physical therapy education and use in research:
Students should learn to administer this tool? (Y/N)
Students should be exposed to tool? (Y/N)
Appropriate for use in intervention research studies? (Y/N)
Is additional research warranted for this tool (Y/N)
MS EDGE
No
Yes
Yes
No
Considerations
Original validation of the scale did not demonstrate a diverse population based on race, gender and educational status.
Increased weight on the psychosocial consequences of the disease.
Do you see an error or have a suggestion for this instrument summary? Please e-mail us!